A bitter High Court dispute has damaged out amongst potential neighbours in excess of the construction of a wall in a coastal web site in a north Dublin suburb, a situation which includes attracted countrywide attention next an Irish Occasions report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres with a proposed family dwelling at Sutton Strand, the place allegations of setting up breaches, environmental issues, and long-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled into the courts. The Irish Moments article about René Collier as well as Irish Situations article about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what began as a neighborhood disagreement has developed right into a highly publicised legal battle.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing in excess of development is effective at the website on Dublin Road, Sutton, wherever Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a doctor and an organization director respectively, seek out to construct their household house. The situation is now emblematic of wider disputes alongside Ireland’s coastline, exactly where advancement pressures collide with environmental protections plus the sensitivities of proven residents. According to the Irish Instances report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall becoming created by their possible neighbours goes past the boundaries permitted under scheduling authorization.
René Collier and Paul Feely, both citizens of Dublin Street, declare that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the terms of their scheduling permission by developing a wall over and above the boundaries in their internet site, bringing about an encroachment on the Special Place of Conservation. The SAC designation is central on the dispute, as such places are subject to rigid controls less than European and Irish environmental legislation. Inside their court filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even slight encroachments might have lasting ecological outcomes, specifically inside of a sensitive coastal setting for example Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny They are really in breach of their organizing authorization, and say the wall, which happens to be partially developed, is in the right posture. Their legal staff has characterised the action as an attempt to delay or frustrate a lawful growth. The few accuse litigants of trying to get to halt homebuilding to be able to maintain their check out, an allegation which has been recurring in court docket and referenced in coverage of the case. This accusation goes to the heart of many coastal setting up disputes, wherever sights of The ocean are both very prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Moments report naming René Collier and Paul Feely described remarkable attempts because of the plaintiffs to doc the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded by ocean in storm to photograph the website, As outlined by sworn proof referenced in the Irish Situations. In one account, Rene Collier waded through midsection-significant h2o throughout a storm to photograph the site Irish Instances, an image which has because turn into emblematic with the intensity of the dispute. These steps were not just symbolic; they had been meant to Get Visible evidence of the wall’s situation relative to tidal lines and guarded land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the site within the sea Irish Moments reported, describing how the two men entered the drinking water during critical weather conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading by way of storm h2o to photograph the positioning turned Just about the most putting descriptions to emerge from court reporting. The Irish Periods article about accountant Paul Feely famous that these types of actions have been cited to display the plaintiffs’ perception that the wall extended into a place influenced by tidal motion, strengthening their argument which the SAC was becoming encroached upon.
The functions at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 were being coated intimately via the nationwide press. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Situations 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Occasions January 27 2026 became extensively searched phrases as visitors sought to be aware of the history and implications of the situation. On that day, the High Court listened to even further submissions on whether or not interim orders needs to be granted to halt building pending a full hearing. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a key instant during the legal timeline.
At the core with the dispute is usually a disagreement around boundaries, arranging compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely keep the wall, as made, goes further than what was authorized and intrudes into protected land. They argue that this is not a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by profession, has become described as meticulous in his examination of setting up paperwork, maps, and circumstances hooked up on the permission.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have both stressed that their action is enthusiastic by worry for environmental protection and adherence to scheduling regulation. They reject statements that the situation is about preserving A non-public watch, insisting alternatively that it's about making certain that development at Sutton Strand respects authorized and ecological restrictions. In affidavits, they may have described their extended-standing connection to the world and their awareness of its environmental sensitivity.
On the opposite facet, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed on their own as a few simply endeavoring to develop a spouse and children residence in accordance with the law. They deny the wall encroaches over a Unique Area of Conservation and say that each one is effective have already been completed dependant on Expert tips and permitted plans. Their attorneys have argued which the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and that the remarkable actions of René Collier and Paul Feely, like moving into The ocean during a storm, don't change the underlying details.
The case has also lifted broader questions on how scheduling disputes are solved in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter court docket dispute around design of wall at coastal site happens to be a shorthand description to get a scenario that a lot of observers see as more and more typical. As sea ranges increase and coastal erosion intensifies, the exact delineation among private land, general public foreshore, and protected habitats is starting to become much more contentious.
The Irish Times posting about René Collier noted which the businessman had Formerly been involved with neighborhood advocacy on planning and environmental concerns, even though not at this scale. In the meantime, the Irish Moments posting about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how people today from René Collier waded through ocean in storm to photograph the site really different Qualified backgrounds can find them selves aligned in these kinds of disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some reports spell their names, are getting to be synonymous Together with the Sutton Strand situation.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the website with the sea Irish Occasions protection emphasised, underlining The weird lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded by means of midsection-large h2o all through a storm to photograph the positioning Irish Times and René Collier waded by means of waistline-large drinking water during a storm to photograph the internet site Irish Periods are phrases that appeared consistently in protection, reflecting both equally the Actual physical truth from the coastline along with the symbolic character of your act. For supporters of the plaintiffs, these actions demonstrated commitment; for critics, they illustrated what they see being an excessive method.
Because the High Court proceedings proceed, the end result stays uncertain. The court must figure out whether the wall as constructed complies with preparing permission and regardless of whether any encroachment into a Unique Area of Conservation has happened. The lawful arguments are intricate, involving interpretation of maps, tidal knowledge, and arranging situations. But the human component continues to be central: neighbours who ought to Stay alongside one another very long following the legal expenditures are paid.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing over development operates at the site on Dublin Highway, Sutton, even so the implications of the situation prolong beyond that tackle. For planners, developers, and inhabitants alike, the dispute serves as being a reminder of the necessity of clarity in organizing permissions and sensitivity in coastal development. What's more, it underscores how swiftly an area disagreement can escalate when fundamental difficulties like environmental defense and property rights are perceived being at stake.
In the meantime, Sutton Strand remains an area of natural attractiveness and contested boundaries. The wall within the centre from the dispute stands partially designed, a physical manifestation of unresolved legal inquiries. Irrespective of whether it's going to in the long run be altered, eradicated, or completed as planned will rely on the courtroom’s results. Until eventually then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their variants will likely carry on to appear in headlines, linked indelibly to The most carefully watched arranging disputes in north Dublin lately.